Iran Could Lose Big Time

Hidden reasons for the attack on the Islamic Republic

The ether is saturated with the horrendous events afflicting the Iranian people; seems as if there is nothing more to be said. Not from my observation; from my lofty perch in the firmament what should be said is not being heard. Reasons for the attack on the Islamic Republic are hidden by the “fog of war.” The war serves no American purpose and Israel’s purposes are more than those stated. Iran could lose the war big time, more than they anticipated. Genocidal Israel and its lackey, the United States, will lose credibility and support; a seething world population is prepared to have them choke. Israel will not care. The victory will extend its territory, power, and influence beyond its borderless borders.

As Israel slowly guides the hostilities, the real reasons for the war against Iran, to which the Trump is in the dark, is slowly being revealed. For the United States, the war on Iran does not follow any strategic plan; it has less conviction than the war on Iraq, where Sadaam Hussein was accused of already having weapons of mass destruction. The mullahs are accused of only considering weapons of mass destruction. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson gave reporters a reason for the attack. “Senior administration officials told Republican and Democratic lawmakers at a classified briefing on Capitol Hill that the Israeli plan to strike Iran pushed the United States to take preemptive action to protect U.S. troops stationed at bases throughout the Middle East, whom the Pentagon believed would have been targeted by retaliatory strikes.”

Is this believable? Knowing that Israel’s belligerent actions will cause damage to United States personnel, the U.S. administration does not attempt to stop the belligerent action that will cause America damage. Trump and company join Israel in the gruesome adventure and gladly invite the damage.

Wait, no that was some administration officials’ reason. Trump had another reason. He claimed that “Iran had been about to attack its neighbors and Israel, and he made the decision to go to war to preempt that action.” Why would Iran attack anyone, knowing that they gain nothing, except getting pulverized? Did Trump preempt that action or assure that action? Can anyone believe this?

Not knowing that the Israeli leadership was giggling and laughing at his remarks, Trump clarified “U.S. aims” — destroying Iran’s missile capabilities and their capacity to produce new ones; annihilating the Iranian navy; ensuring Tehran can never obtain a nuclear weapon; and finally ensuring it cannot arm and fund groups outside their borders. Have the U.S. destroy an Iran that has never has been a threat, is not now a threat, and cannot conceivably ever be a threat to Uncle Sam. In other words, do the dirty work for Israel, as was done in Libya, Sudan, Egypt, Syria, and Iraq.

Sticking their chests out as if they are accomplishing something, which again provokes Israeli leaders into raucous laughter, we hear:

From Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who hardly appears in any of the deliberations and reads from a teleprompter that tells him when to pause and when to emphasize: “If you kill Americans, harm Americans, or threaten Americans, we will hunt you down without apology and without hesitation and we will kill you.” Know of any Americans recently killed, harmed, or threatened by Iranians? I have read of more than a few Americans recently killed, harmed, and threatened by Israelis. By the way, kill, harm or threaten Iranians and they may hunt you down without apology and without hesitation kill you.

Another from Secretary of War Hegeseth: ”We didn’t start this war but we will finishit under President Trump.” True, Israel started the war. Correction: President Trump will not finishit; it will finish him. Israel will finishit when they achieve their aims.

From Secretary of Stateless and looking solemn, Marco Rubio: “Our embassies are being attacked by a terrorist regime.” Iran is not allowed to defend itself against a terrorist attack.

From Trump: “We thought these lunatics were going to attack us, so we attacked first.” Spoken like a true lunatic.

The principal reasons for the war on Iran, of which Trump and his entourage are clueless, were Iran’s vocal condemnation of the genocide of the Palestinian people, and being the only physical opposition to Israel accomplishing that purpose and other covert purposes. The covert purposes began to be exposed in the first day’s attack. Trump recited the reasons and did not know the meaning of his own statement.

President Trump said on Tuesday that officials the United States had eyed as potential new leaders of Iran had been killed in the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign. As the war in the Middle East widened, he said that the worst outcome would be that whoever takes over Iran could be “as bad” as their predecessors.

Wanting to pretend that the U.S. guided the first day attack by providing Israel with intelligence of the daily location of Supreme Leader, Ali Hosseini Khamenei, and other Iranian leaders (Ed: Never proven), Trump contradicted himself by stating, “potential new leaders of Iran had been killed in the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign.” They had not been killed in the “U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign,” they were killed by a solo Israeli strike and, if, Trump directed regime change, why would he permit those who could accomplish regime change and regime turnover to be killed?

In the first attack, Israel, by itself, ensured that Iran would be leaderless, anarchistic, and unable, especially after its military, energy grid, energy sources, and communication were destroyed, to prevent minorities from successfully rebelling and decapitating the ancient state. Israel has cultivated ties with the Kurds and Azerbaijan and is prepared to assist the former in creating a state that will counter Turkey, and the latter in having Iran’s Azeris join their ancient motherland and provide a powerful Central Asian ally. Lackey and clueless Trump continued to serve Israel’s purposes.

In calls this week to Kurdish minority leaders in Iran and neighboring Iraq, President Donald Trump offered “extensive U.S. aircover” and other backing for anti-regime Iranian Kurds to take over portions of western Iran, according to multiple people familiar with the effort.

Trump was clear in his call to PUK leader Bafel Talabani. “He told us the Kurds must choose a side in this battle — either with America and Israel or with Iran,” said the official, one of several Kurdish and U.S. officials who discussed sensitive matters on the condition of anonymity.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah tripped into another planned Israeli provocation, sent a few harmless drones and fired a few harmless missiles at an Israeli base, for which they will be rewarded by Israel extending itself to the Litani River. Hezbollah’s rockets were its first major violation of the November 2024 agreed “ceasefire.” According to the UN, since the agreement date, “Israel has bombed Lebanon on a near daily basis, killing over 340 people, and committing over 15,000 ceasefire violations. It also established five military positions and two ‘buffer zones’ inside Lebanon.”

Extending borders to the Litani River finalizes a pursuit described in the Zionist 2019 platform and which Israel attempted to achieve in its 1956 attack on Egypt by seizing the Sinai and trying to convince France and Great Britain to allow its expansion into Lebanon up to the Litani River.

Note that Greater Israel extends close to Beirut in Lebanon, Damascus in Syria, and Amman in Jordan. The boundary captures all the aquifers and facilitates use of the now archaic Hedjaz railway.

Rarely mentioned is a controversial meeting, known as the, 1956 Protocol of Sevres, and reported in Anatomy of a War Plot, Avi Shlaim, International Affairs, 73:3 (1997), pp.509-530, which describes Israel Prime Minister David ben Gurion’s proposed plan to Great Britain and France, and executes the Zionist proposals. Although the meeting records are not available in French and British government archives, the meeting occurrence and parts of ben Gurion’s plan are confirmed in Shimon Peres: the biography by Michael Bar-Zohar.

The session started at 4 p.m. on Monday, 22 October, in the conservatory of the villa and it was intended to enable the leaders of the two countries to get to know each other and to have a preliminary discussion. Ben-Gurion opened the discussion by listing his military, political and moral considerations against “the English plan”. His main objection was that Israel would be branded as the aggressor while Britain and France would pose as peace-makers but he was also exceedingly apprehensive about exposing Israeli cities to attack by the Egyptian Air Force. Instead he presented a comprehensive plan, which he himself called “fantastic”, for the reorganization of the Middle East. Jordan, he observed, was not viable as an independent state and should therefore be divided. Iraq would get the East Bank in return for a promise to settle the Palestinian refugees there and to make peace with Israel while the West Bank would be attached to Israel as a semi-autonomous region. Lebanon suffered from having a large Muslim population which was concentrated in the south. The problem could be solved by Israel’s expansion up to the Litani River, thereby helping to turn Lebanon into a more compact Christian state. The Suez Canal area should be given an international status while the Straits of Tiran in the Gulf of Aqaba should come under Israeli control to ensure freedom of navigation. A prior condition for realizing this plan was the elimination of Nasser and the replacement of his regime with a pro-Western government which would also be prepared to make peace with Israel.

Enlarging upon the ethnic cleansing plans in Gaza and the West Bank, Israel has forced the evacuation of villages below the Litani River. From the Washington Post, March 4, 2026. “The Israeli military issued a statement Wednesday telling people living in dozens of villages in southern Lebanon close to the border with Israel to evacuate and move “immediately” north of the Litani River.”

With Iran demolished, Turkey occupied with the Kurds, and stronger friends to help in its expansion plans, Israel will continue its genocide unimpeded and slowly extend its territory in accord with the Zionist vision and its neurotic impulses ─ victory of a mythical Jewish kingdom over an Islamic kingdom, defeat of the descendants from Cyrus the Great , king of the Achaemenid Persian Empire, who graciously permitted exiled Jews to return to their homeland. No good deed goes unpunished.

In the meantime, the attack on Iran, a relatively defenseless nation that had not harmed its neighbors, has moved the western peoples into reality — apartheid Israel and the U.S. are lying, scheming, vicious, and ignorant nations, leading the world to destruction. A recent Gallup poll reveals, “Forty-one percent of Americans say they sympathize more with the Palestinians in the Middle East situation, while 36% sympathize more with the Israelis. The five-percentage-point difference is not statistically significant, but it contrasts with a clear lead for the Israelis only a year ago (46% vs. 33%) and larger leads over the prior 24 years.... Currently, 65% of Democrats say their sympathies lie more with the Palestinians, while 17% say they sympathize more with the Israelis” Primary elections in North Carolina and Texas have demonstrated that the war waged on Iran has rapidly shifted sentiment; an awakening against AIPAC and Israel has occurred and, finally, the anger is being translated into votes.

In North Carolina House District 4 Democratic primary, incumbent Valerie Foushee purposely rejected AIPAC funds to help herself in an effort that barely beat Nida Allam, a 32-year-old commissioner in Durham County, who was funded by “a new super PAC founded expressly to counter AIPAC’s influence.”

In Texas, state Rep. James Talarico defeated U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett and won the Democratic Primary for U.S. Senate. Talarico, who is attending a Presbyterian seminary, is an outspoken critic of Christian nationalism and AIPAC. “He criticized Democrats for supporting Israel’s war in Gaza during the 2024 presidential election and has called the war ‘the moral test of our time.’”

In Texas’s 30th congressional district, Reverend Frederick Douglas Haynes won the Democratic primary by a landslide, 72.6% to 23.1%. Haynes has been a strong supporter of the Palestinians. In a 2023 sermon, “he spoke out against Israel and admitted that most want to support the country so they won’t get in trouble. ‘Well, I’m here to get in trouble,’ he said.”

If the outcomes of the primaries forecast the outcomes of the November congressional races, then the intensive battle against the Zionist foe, the greatest threat to world survival since the Biblical flood, is underway. Those who believe they are the Chosen People that “Even though I walk through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me,” will soon learn that modern life is not moved by Biblical myths and 7 billion of the world’s people do not entertain succumbing to a nuclear inferno because of a relatively few disoriented minds.