The World Has Spoken
Israel Must Go.
The world has spoken — in elections, MAGA rebellions, demonstrations, attacks on Zionists, personal sacrifices, editorials by previously Israel aligned commentators, growing number of anti-Zionist Jews, and vocal outcries — genocidal Israel and its worldwide sponsors of global criminality must go. Two unanswered questions — where does Israel go and how does this happen?
From a slowly increasing number of people who realized that something was inconsistent in the descriptions between Israelis and Palestinians — Israelis were not suffering and Palestinians were gasping, Israelis were gaining land and Palestinians were losing land, Israelis were being elevated and Palestinians were being destroyed, Israelis were perpetrating massacres and Palestinians were being massacred — the world has reached an inflection point of actualization; a point at which the curve rises asymptotically and rapidly increases its numbers.
The numbers bump against one another, anguished at the present, fearful of the outcome, seeking a solution that impedes genocide, uniting in a “call to action” that will defeat the criminal enterprise known as Zionism. Immersed in the numbers are the multitudes of those who had favored Israel and succumbed to the presentation of Zionists as progressive and innocent pioneers, working barren grounds in harsh conditions. Realization that the secular Kibbutz pioneer was a short-lived phenomenon of hard-working and self-sacrificing immigrants, captured in prose by the poet Rachel, and has been replaced by a gun-toting, hardly working religious orthodox, who lives comfortably in a house supplied by the Israeli government on groomed hilltop land and spends the day battering Palestinians, has transformed Israel admirers into Israel adversaries.
On the Shores of the Kinneret by Rachel
Dawn rises when we begin to work. We number fourteen, with blistered hands and tan, bare and scratched legs. Strong faces, burning hearts. The whole air echoes our tunes, our talk and our laughter. The hoes go endlessly up and down. For a moment one may stop working and wipe the sweat from the forehead with the corner of a kaffiyeh, and throw a loving glance at the sea
I went to the West Bank to bear witness to the destruction there by Ilana Blumberg, Times of Israel.
Palestinians are chased away from the land designated for them by attacks of fire, gunfire, sadistic slaughter of animals, and the threat of worse. In Hamam Al Maliah, where I visited, the morning after my visit to an abandoned spot, Jewish Israelis had set up a prayer service there, and a video celebrating the return of the land from “Ishmaelite” hands to Jewish hands was published on social media. Days later, the town’s small schoolhouse was torn down overnight. Everything in it, including the children’s picture book, Dirah Lehaskir, (“Apartment To Let”), in Arabic translated from the Hebrew, was destroyed. The army camp across the road reported seeing nothing.
Never, in all history, have the world’s peoples organized in a massive common effort to protest and halt abuse, oppression, and genocide committed by a government against another people, as they have in apartheid Israel’s aggression against the Palestinian nation. It’s not hatred for Israel and its people that drives the protests; it’s more anguishing; an uneasy and gruesome feeling, similar to confronting a serial killer. It’s more encompassing; Israel’s government, all of its leaders, its Jewish citizens, and its worldwide supporters are complicit in the genocide, not deserving to share a dinner table with others, deserving antipathy and disdain from everyone. New York Times columnist, Nicholas Kristoff, reporting from the West Bank, May 11, 2026, tells one of the shocking stories, which is not new, a B’Tselem report, “Welcome to Hell,” published in 2024, related a similar narrative.
In wrenching interviews, Palestinians have recounted to me a pattern of widespread Israeli sexual violence against men, women and even children — by soldiers, settlers, interrogators in the Shin Bet internal security agency and, above all, prison guards.
“Israeli forces systematically employ rape and sexual torture to humiliate Palestinian female detainees,” the Euro-Med report [April 2026] said. It cited a 42-year-old woman who said she had been shackled naked to a metal table as Israeli soldiers forcibly had sex with her over two days while other soldiers filmed the attacks. Afterward, she said, she was shown photos of her being raped and told they would be published if she did not cooperate with Israeli intelligence.
PM Netanyahu’s response ─ anti-Semite. Another government official used another of the usual metaphors ─ blood libel. One–worded attacks that tell us the report is true.
Zionists recognize that world opinion does not favor their continuation and they don’t care. They only care about themselves and rationalize and twist the events. Listen to David Horovitz, founding editor of The Times of Israel.
We’re not in the 1930s… yet. Diaspora Jews the world over face a rising tide not ‘merely’ of Israel-hatred but, increasingly, of Jew-hatred. And where social media incitement, misrepresentation, religious indoctrination and miseducation lead the public, politicians are quick to follow
That’s changed now. Just as Diaspora life the world over has changed — most especially since Hamas invaded Israel on October 7, 2023, and a vast, well-prepared campaign swung into action to demonize the Jewish state and deny it the right to defend itself against aggressors openly determined to destroy it. It swept up Jew-haters from left and right. And, by the violent actions of its own adherents, targeting not only those members of the Jewish people who live in Israel, but Jews everywhere, it has shown itself to be a rising tide not “merely” of Israel-hatred but of Jew-hatred.
A relatively few of the 15 million Jews in the world are being knocked around by a relatively few of the one billion people living in the western world, while tens of Palestinians, Lebanese, and, for a while Iranians, are murdered daily by the people Mr. Horvitz defends, and he only sees harm done to innocent Jews. Horvitz refuses to recognize that attacks against Jews are due to the harm he and his cohorts are inflicting upon others. Well, Mr. Horvits, this is the 1930s, multiplied by several magnitudes, only the Israelis are the Nazis, and the Middle East peoples take the place of the 1930 German Jews.
The number of worldwide organizations and activities that counter the genocide have no precedent in responses to oppression.
Elections have included stances on the genocide and relationships of candidates to AIPAC. Election of Zohran Kwame Mamdani, an ardent supporter of Palestinian rights, as the 112th mayor of New York City, a city identified with the Zionist movement, and nationwide primary elections, in which candidates have refused AIPAC money and pro-Israel candidates have been defeated, signify a shift in American sentiment away from favoring Israel.
MAGA leaders — Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, and former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene — have broken with Trump and voiced strong opinions against Israel’s genocidal tactics and influence in the American government. These leaders have large followings and will influence voters in coming elections.
Demonstrations continue worldwide, despite Israel’s influencers’ attempts to impede them. Protests that highlight apartheid Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians have stirred the world community into decisive actions.
Attacks on suspected Zionists and their institutions, performed more for highlighting the issues than harming individuals, are increasing rapidly.
Personal sacrifices to highlight the genocide are occurring. Britisher Daniel Day climbed the Elizabeth Tower (Big Ben) in London and remained there for over 16 hours as a protest against British involvement in Gaza
Editorials from previous Israel aligned commentators, such as that from Nicholas Kristoff, indicate the media is shifting from all out support of the tyrant.
The growing number of anti-Zionist Jews, speaking loudly and acting boldly, have started a bandwagon of desertions from a strict Jewish support of Israel. Members of Jewish campus organization Hillel at Middlebury College voted to rename the group and depart from Hillel International. Reason ─ the organization’s pro-Israel stance no longer reflected the values of many Jewish students on campus.
Vocal outcries at meetings, demonstrations, artistic gatherings, cultural functions, and international events highlight the intense feelings that seek expression. Irish singer Becky Hill publicly addressed crowds, urging them to raise voices against Israel’s war crimes and shout for a free Palestine.
Despite the extensive and commendable efforts of a massive part of humanity, Israel’s trajectory to demolish the Palestinian community and fulfill the commandment of a Greater Israel remains unchallenged. Lingering in the commotion are the ever unanswered questions — where does Israel go and how does this happen?
Zionists shriek and rant that the protests are intended to delegitimize Israel and push out Israelis “from Jordan to the Sea,” which more accurately describes Zionist intentions toward the Palestinians. Their ravings provide the answer to the first question.
Israel has never acceded to any of the UN Resolutions that condemned its behavior. Zionism’s “just drive forward and listen to no one” statement is an “all or nothing” philosophy. Because they want all, which they cannot obtain, they will receive what they propose as an alternative ─ nothing. If defeated, they will pack up, leave, and raise the Star of David in established satellite communities in New York, California, and Florida. Few Israelis will notice a change of locale.
How this happens is more difficult to decipher.
Israel is a formidable military power and cannot be defeated on the battlefield without severe damage to its adversaries. No combined armada wants to engage in that battle. Internal or external forces exist that can defeat the present Israel, difficult but possible.
Hiding behind a facade of a unified country, Israel is endangered by polarized constituencies and internal frictions of religious differences, racism, and economic inequalities that will grow. Not widely publicized is that, at 17.9 percent, Israel has the third highest poverty rate in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and is number 46 in CATO Institute’s Human Freedom Index; Hungary is at 45th place. No murmurs of rebellion or coup d’etat at this moment; maybe there is quiet seething. Faced with an external moral and economic bludgeoning and internal frictions, especially between secular and orthodox Jews, Jews will leave Israel and eruptions will eventually happen
By sheer numbers, Israel’s adversaries will swamp Israel’s friends. The Zionists may not be able to retain unqualified support from Evangelists, and will have the worldwide media and its deceptive propaganda mechanisms greatly diminished. The Democratic Party is no longer tightly aligned with Israel and, if it obtains executive power, may change the relationship. If that occurs, other nations could follow and modify their relationships. Once Israel loses advantage, its dominance will decay quickly. Hopefully, the electoral momentum will sufficiently change governing bodies and governments will force the Zionists to pack up and leave. Non-Zionists can stay.
Accomplishing the task involves changing a mindset that has been convinced the Jews deserve a nation, have a nation, and UN Proclamation 181 certified the plea for nationhood. All are untrue.
Is there a nation called Israel? Not according to Israel; its answer to proposals for either two-state or one-state solutions for the Middle East crisis is simple ─ a no-state solution, a route Israel has deceptively pursued from day one and is prepared to purse for eternity. Here are the facts:
Borders define a nation. Israel has no defined borders.
There is no Israel nationality. In modern and democratic nation states, nationality and citizenship are identical. Israel has more than 130 recognized nationalities to register for an ID card, most prominent being, Jewish, Arab, and Druze. The recognized nationalities might be Israeli citizens, but none is an Israel national. Because nation implies people of a common nationality, Israel cannot be a certified nation.
Laws govern a nation and some of Israel’s laws are contested and prejudicial applied. Israel does not have a written constitution and is governed by a basic set of incomplete laws. When convenient, the government invokes and incorporates British Mandate law into its legal system for managing security and administration in occupied territories. The British 1945 Defense (Emergency) Regulations provide the legal framework for house demolitions. There is no civil marriage. Jews can only be married by an Orthodox rabbi under the authority of the Chief Rabbinate Religious. Interfaith marriages cannot be performed within the country.
A large percentage of Israelis do not live in Israel. Accurate statistics are not available, but a figure of more than 1 million Israelis living abroad, which is 10% of the population, has been accepted. Claims have been made that an estimated 70-80 percent of Israeli Jews have passports from other nations, and a quarter of all Israeli academics live abroad.
The Israeli Right of Return, which permits Jews from any nation to migrate to Israel and automatically have the right to apply for citizenship, is not a rule pursued by nations, except Armenia. Nations that have a Right of Return give that right to previous nationals and usually their children. By granting non-citizens title to citizenry only because they are Jews, Israel does not operate as a normal nation.
Israel does not have a recognized capital city. Nations with Embassies in Jerusalem are few — United States, Guatemala, Honduras, Papua, New Guinea, Fiji, Paraguay, Kosovo, and Nauru.
Israel’s Nation State Law established a privileged Jewish community, governed by communal administration, with an extension to Jews in other nations, who can align themselves with Israeli society. This makes Israel an atavistic revival to a tribal form of governance, where borders and boundaries are not fixed. It is as if the mythical Joshua, leader of the Biblical Conquest, is brought back to life and, with sword and Lord, clears the land for the “chosen people.”
Important and overlooked.
When UN Resolution 181 partitioned Palestine on 29 November 1947, the population statistics showed about 500,000 Jews (mostly new to the area) and 1.1 million Arabs in the partitioned land. The Arab population was indigenous to the area with almost its entire population born to parents who had resided in the Levant. The Arab population also owned and occupied a major part of the territory with one area, the Negev, mainly inhabited by Bedouin tribes.
Because neither state had official names at that time, the designations of Arab and Jewish states were artificially used to map out contours of land where the major portions of each ethnicity would live. The designated Jewish state, not its name nor its description, meant the area carved out to contain the Jewish population, despite the area being principally owned by Arabs and containing an almost equal number of Palestinians. That area, which hastily became Israel just before President Truman recognized the state, failed at that moment of origin. Although the state was bi-national, a small Zionist group took control of all apparatus of the new state, and did that without consulting any Palestinian leadership. What leadership, well, no defined leadership, but place it all in proper context.
A census will have shown about 500,000 people described as Jews in the new state (another 100,000 in Jerusalem), but only a portion of that group had lived in the area for a long period of time and only that portion had investment in its past, present, or future. In 1850, there were only 13,000 Jews in Palestine and mostly in Jerusalem. In 1947, outside of Jerusalem, there were a few thousand descendants of those Jews and about 40,000 earlier 20th century Zionists. All other Jews had arrived within the previous 30 years and not necessarily to stay — some to work in the British Mandate, many fleeing Nazi Germany, others from refugee camps after World War II, and some adventurers. Relatively few Jews were native to the region and almost all were from foreign nations. The UN divided one Palestinian state into two Palestinian states — a Palestinian state composed of almost 100 percent Palestinians, and a Palestinian state composed of about 650,000 native to the area, of whom about 60 percent were Palestinians (400,000 Palestinians), and 40 percent were foreign Jews and their children (250,000), who had arrived earlier to live permanently in Palestine. Another contingent of foreign Jews (250,000) had arrived for expediency and not with intention of remaining in the British Mandate. From that perspective, David Ben-Gurion and a small clique of opportunists took advantage of an ill-advised UN, an ill-led and ill- equipped Palestinian community, and a confused world to declare their state, and, with seasoned militia forces — Haganah, Irgun, Lehi, and Palmach — cleansed the area of Palestinians and established Israel
The Palestinians were neither prepared to govern nor be governed. Aware of this, and by not enforcing Article 4 of Resolution 181, the UN shamelessly allowed the expulsion of the Palestinians and did not stop the havoc.
Article 4. The Commission, after consultation with the democratic parties and other public organizations of The Arab and Jewish States, shall select and establish in each State as rapidly as possible a Provisional Council of Government. The activities of both the Arab and Jewish Provisional Councils of Government shall be carried out under the general direction of the Commission. If by 1 April 1948 a Provisional Council of Government cannot be selected for either of the States, {ED: That did not happen] or, if selected, cannot carry out its functions, the Commission shall communicate that fact to the Security Council for such action with respect to that State as the Security Council may deem proper, and to the Secretary-General for communication to the Members of the United Nations.
The UN inquiry committee, which proposed the majority resolution of two separate states, displayed a lack of knowledge of what constituted a nation-state. After the decline of empires, nation states rose from strong leaders binding tribes of similar linguistic, cultural, social, and historical backgrounds, all of whom had lived in a contiguous area for generations, into a national entity. Palestinians had the credentials to become a nation-state; the Jews, who spoke different languages, had differing social and historical backgrounds, came from different areas, and had been in the region for a short time, did not have the attachments to form a nation-state.
The culprits in the havoc and crises that have plagued the Middle East are the nations that voted for the Partition Plan and the United Nations that permitted the hostilities and crimes to escalate. They owe the Palestinians, the Middle East peoples, and a world that expects justice, a reversal of their fateful decisions.
Actions can be taken.
Jewish populations should take legal action against Israel for placing them in jeopardy and unfairly transgressing upon their lives. All nations should consider the egregious consequences of the Nation State Law, one of which is that some of their citizens have loyalty to another state, and take administrative action — vocal, diplomatic, and in international institutions.
The world has spoken. Israel must go. The momentum to accomplish that goal is beginning to take shape. It needs only a U.S. president exclaiming, “Israel tear down that separation wall,” and a western world that imposes economic measures that brings Israelis into desperate economic conditions. Techies finding one zero missing from their six figure salaries will carry their bone marrow and cerebral neurons to richer climes. The well-educated and equally knowledgeable Palestinians will take their place, the democratic and just state of Palestine will be created, peace will be restored, and the world, which includes the Jewish community, will regain its moral compass.